for those of you looking up porn, haha i made you lose your turn on. AND WOULD IT KILL YOU TO READ A DAMN BOOK?!
this one is about personality types and people talking.
first the difference between literalists, judgementalists, and criticists
literalists: their actions, questions, and statements [as well as anything else] are done in a LITERAL MANNER.
this means that when they ask, "why did you paint your car pink?"
they are asking, "why did you paint your car pink?"
literalists are simple and to the point, preferring straight forward actions and simple solutions over complex nonsensical plans. literalists would rather just rip out the loose tooth or tell people the flat truth than come up with a complex lie or plan to remove the tooth. however, literalists tend to take interest in WATCHING complex plans. literalists also have a tendency to be arrogant at times, believing that the faster the plan the more efficient it is.
judgementalists: their actions, questions, and statements are done in a literal manner as well. however they are what is known as "two-faced", holding in how they REALLY feel and posting a false facade.
they will ask, "why did you paint your car pink?"
when they really mean, "are you gay or sometthing?" "what, are you a cissy?" [btw do NOT look that up] "what the hell? youre an idiot! WHY PINK?!"
judgementalists basically tend to rip things apart passing criticisms with no intent to help people improve. while they act and speak one way they think another. they tend to support people while talking behind their backs and are arrogant like literalists. unlike literalists though they dont like plans, theyd rather tear them apart.
criticists: their actions, questions, and statements are a mix of literalists and judgementalists. they tend to be both brutally honest and also two faced, telling people how they really feel. the difference with criticists is that
when they ask "why did you paint your car pink?"
they really mean "why pink?" "why did you paint your car pink?! why not black with silver stripes?"
criticists act with the best interests of others, but not always with the knowledge necessary to act. they will act and speak, seeming insensitive, but in reality believing that they know better for others. criticists tend to BELIEVE they are compassionate and that their actions are definable because they are in the best interest of others. they can be dangerous in positions of power as they will make decisions that they BELIEVE are in the best interest for the group, but in REALITY are EXTREMELY harmful and hurtful to the vast majority.
No comments:
Post a Comment